> This breaks compatibility, both for an old kernel and a new dt and a new > kernel with an old dt. Is anyone using these bindings? They only affect Samsung SoCs and have only been upstream for half a year, so I doubt it's heavily used. > Why are we describing fewer registers now? Are they described elsewhere? > > The dt should describe the device, not only the portion of it Linux > wants to use right now. This only ever described a small section of the huge set of PMU registers anyway. Before it described up to three registers controlling different PHYs (using hardcoded offsets in the code to later find the right one)... with my patch every PHY's DT entry only describes the one register concerning itself, which makes more sense in my opinion. It will also prevent the register descriptions in different DT entries from overlapping. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
