On 08/06/2013 02:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> pinctrl bindings can benefit from generic property names that define >> which pins a "pin configuration node" affects, and which mux function >> to select onto those pins. Document new properties for this purpose so >> that other bindings may refer to them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt >> index 31b0cb9..237823a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt >> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ structure of the DT nodes that contain these properties. >> >> Supported generic properties are: >> >> +pins - the list of pins that properties in the node >> + apply to >> +function - the mux function to select > > I assume the type of these properties must be described in the more > specific binding? Yes, I think so. I guess I should also add entries into the section right below this list which describes the values for each of the properties that has values. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
