Definition of "should" seems inconsistent with idea of "deprecated"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



  Reading DTSpec v0.4, near the beginning:

"The word should is used to indicate that among several possibilities
one is recommended as particularly suitable, without mentioning or
excluding others; or that a certain course of action is preferred but
not necessarily required; or that (in the negative form) a certain
course of action is deprecated but not prohibited (should equals is
recommended that)."

  It seems contradictory to suggest that "should" implies
"recommended" but, in the negative sense, it can also support
"deprecated", which typically suggests something that is *not*
recommended but is nonetheless acceptable.

  It just seems like that's giving off mixed messages.

rday




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux