On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:01 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 1:26 AM David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 06:57:54AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > There’s an old thread about this from 2016: > > > > > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree-spec/msg00296.html > > > > > > That is not the only case of this - IIRC old Apple machine device > > > trees had both an 'l2-cache' property and an 'l2-cache' node under > > > each CPU node. > > > > According to a dump I have, '/cpus/PowerPC,G4' has 'l2-cache' property > > and '/cpus/PowerPC,G4/PowerPC,G4' node has a node name of 'l2-cache'. > > So this would actually work with yaml if we brought back explicit > > 'name' properties. But this highlights we've already diverged from > > OpenFirmware. > > For reference, the new Mac Mini has a "pmgr" node that has both > a property clpc=<0x3> and a child node named 'clpc'. That's the tip of the iceberg for the new Apple stuff. I have no interest in supporting a 3rd firmware interface as that is what it is. It may share some heritage with DT, but it's 15 years of Apple evolving their own thing in a vacuum. Rob
