Re: Device Tree Evolution Project - call notes - 12th February

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Francois!

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:23:35PM +0100, Francois Ozog wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 15:51, Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

>>       26. AB: When discussed moving years ago - discussed to put in
>>           separate directories out of tree. As long as still plan on
>>           moving them out. Don’t want to move them twice. If around
>>           the same time would do them together. First want to get
>>           agreement on overlays. Takes half a year. how many files?
>>       27. BM: think github is fairly complete or at least a good
>>           estimate. Covers only the boards we actively support.
>>       28. AB: RPi tree has around 300 overlays.
>>       29. RH: For TI is 12.
>>       30. BM: Beaglebone capes are not overlays. If a customer of TI
>>           invents own overlays - vendor should be “Customer X”, not
>>           TI. Is that aligned with your thinking?
>If we take the "responsibility" out of the picture, I would have
>thought those are overlays. Or shall we name them something like
>"composable DTBs" ?

Sorry, I'm not following you here. Maybe the notes aren't clear
enough, and my addled brain is struggling to remember exactly what was
said here. :-/

Cheers,
-- 
Steve McIntyre                                steve.mcintyre@xxxxxxxxxx
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux