Re: dtc fails to compile <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




On 4/4/17 3:50 AM, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 at 14:55, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
>> <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 31 March 2017 at 18:31, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
>>>> <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 30 March 2017 at 17:39, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
>>>>>> <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I build DT for thermal zone according to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt#L261
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but dtc (DTC 1.4.1-g53bf130b) fails with syntax error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Error: ../dts/xrx500.dtsi:1060.14-15 syntax error
>>>>>>>     FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is with cooling-device property
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       cooling-maps {
>>>>>>> 295                         map0 {
>>>>>>> 296                                 trip = <&cpu_alert0>;
>>>>>>> 297                                 cooling-device =
>>>>>>> 298                                     <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>>>>>>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
>>>>>>> 299                         };
>>>>>>> 300                 };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if I use phandle like <&cpu0> it compiles but  <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
>>>>>>> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>; fails.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What could be a reason? any hint ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you run it thru the C preprocessor first? Simple #defines are
>>>>>> supported in dts files, but you have to use the C preprocessor before
>>>>>> passing to dtc. The builds of dts files in the kernel tree do this for
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes,  but preprocessor does not resolve  THERMAL_NO_LIMIT which is
>>>>> located in include/linux/thermal.h as far as I can see.
>>>>
>>>> That's by design. dts files should only include include/dt-bindings/*
>>>> as they are part of the ABI.
>>>
>>> So, why does dtc fails on  THERMAL_NO_LIMIT if this is defined in
>>> include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h?
>>
>> It is and there are there are lots of users in the tree that all
>> compile. Maybe something mips specific is not picking up the include
>> path?
> 
> Indeed, I see it now :) Many thanks for helping me to understand this better.
> 
> Waldek
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
Waldek,

Perhaps you could share what you found so that you won't leave us all
hanging here wondering how to fix problems such as this?

Chris

-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux