Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: create a partition type device tree binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

(...)
>  (2) we should define a comptible property for the hard-coded
>  partitioning case (e.g., compatible = "partitions")
(...)
> If we went with option (2), then ofpart.c could just check only for
> 'compatible = "partitions"' (or similar), and if not found bail out.

So this "hard-coded partitioning case" the case is where all partitions
are defined in the device tree as described in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt ?

Or is it a way to indicate that this array
static const char * const part_probe_types_def[] = {
        "cmdlinepart", "RedBoot", "ofpart", "ofoldpart", NULL };
in physmap_of.c should be used?

Sorry if I don't fully follow, I'm a bit stupid when it comes to the MTD
helicopter  view of the situation.... :(

> I think option (2) makes more sense. But it would require an update to
> the binding and code for 4.4, since [1] was only introduced during this
> release cycle.

Does that mean all old device trees that specify no compatible
string all of a sudden stop working? We can't break the DT ABI, so I
guess not.

A bit confused here, I can't really see what I should do with the patch...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux