On Friday 11 September 2015 10:17:00 Lee Jones wrote: > <hijacking> > > That doesn't work for middle-layer drivers such as Remoteproc, where > it doesn't have its own associated firmwares. Remoteproc's job is > simply to load the firmware. It doesn't care which version of the ABI > that particular binary uses, and has no reason to. Ideally, I guess > the Remoteproc client should be providing the firmware name, but why > should the client care who or what was used to load the firmware? > > </hijacking> > Does remoteproc use request_firmware() then? If not, it's irrelevant to this discussion. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
