On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:42:25AM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Convert the ti-phy.txt binding to standard YAML DT binding > > format. This binding references the YAML generic PHY binding. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.yaml | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..ec93501 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +id: omap-control-phy > > + > > +title: OMAP Control PHY > > + > > +compatible: > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-otghs" > > + description: if it has otghs_control mailbox register as on OMAP4. > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-usb2" > > + description: if it has Power down bit in control_dev_conf register > > + e.g. USB2_PHY on OMAP5. > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-pipe3" > > + description: if it has DPLL and individual Rx & Tx power control > > + e.g. USB3 PHY and SATA PHY on OMAP5. > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-pcie" > > + description: for pcie to support external clock for pcie and to > > + set PCS delay value. e.g. PCIE PHY in DRA7x > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-usb2-dra7" > > + description: if it has power down register like USB2 PHY on DRA7 > > + DRA7 platform. > > + - name: "ti,control-phy-usb2-am437" > > + description: if it has power down register like USB2 PHY on AM437 > > + platform. > > I'm confused. If these descriptions are multi-line, don't they need the '>' > syntax? Consider that a bug ;) Yes, they should have '>'. Since I'm just using the default core yaml schema validator this is perfectly legal when I run it through yaml. It would mess up formating when output to a document. > Also, I'm still confused by the "name:" field in this section. These are > possible *values* for the compatible property, not the name of the field, > as all other property descriptions are. Ok, so that's a legacy artifact of several incarnations of these tags before I posted initially. I agree, it should be "string" or "value", probably the latter as you suggest. -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
