2014-06-27 1:02 GMT-07:00 Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 19:24 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> If we were serious about doing this, how would you recommend we move >> forward, should we aim at doing something similar to the virtio >> specification and publish an update Device Tree binding specification >> as part of an OASIS working group? > > I'm sure OASIS admins would be delighted to have more non-XML-related > standards in the portfolio ;-) > > One thing I must point out (after going through the process with virtio) > is that in order to participate in a OASIS Technical Committee, one must > be either an employee of a company being a OASIS member, or pay for an > individual membership (there seem to be some limitations in this case > though). OASIS people are very strict on this (also on the communication > channels - ie. all discussions *must* happen on the official OASIS > mailing lists) due to IP Rights policies. Ok, that should not be a problem, I can certainly get my employer to back me up on this initiative. I am mostly wondering if having something aside from ePAPR either makes sense or is something that is desirable to have for the various open-source and proprietary boot loader and OSes out there that use Device Tree. Thanks -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
