Re: [PATCH] fdtoverlay: Fix usage string to not mention "<type>"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hello David,

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:54:19PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:08:59AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > fdtoverlay doesn't have a -t option, so explaining the type formats and
> > modifier prefixes doesn't make much sense.
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I was unsure if I'm supposed to add a signed-off-by line. It's not
> > formalized in the git repo, so I assume it won't have any juristical
> > semantic anyhow and I didn't add it.
> It's true we've never formalized this, but I do generally prefer S-o-b
> lines to be present.
> The patch LGTM, so if you could resent with the signoff I'll apply.

Then I wonder about the semantic of the Signed-off-by for dtc. Do you
believe it has any juristical effect if you don't give it an explicit
meaning for the project? INAL, but it feels wrong to me to insist on a
formalism but not having formalized its meaning.

Best regards

Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux