> On Feb 9, 2021, at 6:08 PM, David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:50:59AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Treat a node-name and property name at the same level of tree as >> an error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Nack. Discouraging/banning this at the spec level for future trees is > reasonable. But dtc should be able to handle old trees that *do* have > node/property conflicts as well. Then we can make this a warning instead of an error. Or a user is always about to disable this via the ’no-…’ command line option. - k > >> --- >> checks.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c >> index 17cb689..3f46043 100644 >> --- a/checks.c >> +++ b/checks.c >> @@ -330,6 +330,22 @@ static void check_node_name_format(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, >> } >> ERROR(node_name_format, check_node_name_format, NULL, &node_name_chars); >> >> +static void check_node_name_vs_property_name(struct check *c, >> + struct dt_info *dti, >> + struct node *node) >> +{ >> + struct property *prop; >> + >> + if (node->parent) { >> + for_each_property(node->parent, prop) { >> + if (strcmp(node->name, prop->name) == 0) >> + FAIL(c, dti, node, "node name and property name conflict"); >> + } >> + } >> +} >> +ERROR(node_name_vs_property_name, check_node_name_vs_property_name, >> + NULL, &node_name_chars); >> + >> static void check_unit_address_vs_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, >> struct node *node) >> { >> @@ -1796,7 +1812,7 @@ WARNING(graph_endpoint, check_graph_endpoint, NULL, &graph_nodes); >> static struct check *check_table[] = { >> &duplicate_node_names, &duplicate_property_names, >> &node_name_chars, &node_name_format, &property_name_chars, >> - &name_is_string, &name_properties, >> + &name_is_string, &name_properties, &node_name_vs_property_name, >> >> &duplicate_label, >> > > -- > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson