SPI slaves only have a single child node and therefore don't need '#address-cells' nor '#size-cells', so let's skip the check for those when 'spi-slave' is present. Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- checks.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c index 17cb6890d45a..c923295c6e40 100644 --- a/checks.c +++ b/checks.c @@ -1102,13 +1102,12 @@ static void check_spi_bus_bridge(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct no if (node->bus != &spi_bus || !node->children) return; - if (get_property(node, "spi-slave")) - spi_addr_cells = 0; - if (node_addr_cells(node) != spi_addr_cells) - FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #address-cells for SPI bus"); - if (node_size_cells(node) != 0) - FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #size-cells for SPI bus"); - + if (!get_property(node, "spi-slave")) { + if (node_addr_cells(node) != spi_addr_cells) + FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #address-cells for SPI bus"); + if (node_size_cells(node) != 0) + FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #size-cells for SPI bus"); + } } WARNING(spi_bus_bridge, check_spi_bus_bridge, NULL, &addr_size_cells); -- 2.25.1