[PATCH] libfdt: Correct condition for reordering blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



This condition uses bitwise OR but should be logical OR. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
---

 libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
index 524b520..93e4a2b 100644
--- a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
+++ b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ int fdt_open_into(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
 			return struct_size;
 	}
 
-	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) |
+	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) ||
 	    !fdt_blocks_misordered_(fdt, mem_rsv_size, struct_size)) {
 		/* no further work necessary */
 		err = fdt_move(fdt, buf, bufsize);
-- 
2.27.0.290.gba653c62da-goog




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux