On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:31:10PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> An interrupt provider (an actual interrupt-controller node or an
> interrupt nexus) should have both #address-cells and #interrupt-cells
> properties explicitly defined.
>
> Add an extra test for this. We check for the #interrupt-cells property
> already, but this does not cover every controller so far, only those that
> get referenced by an interrupts property in some node. Also we miss
> interrupt nexus nodes.
>
> A missing #address-cells property is less critical, but creates
> ambiguities when used in interrupt-map properties, so warn about this as
> well now.
> This removes the now redundant warning in the existing interrupts test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> checks.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tests/bad-interrupt-controller.dts | 7 +++++++
> tests/run_tests.sh | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/bad-interrupt-controller.dts
>
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index 4b3c486..a8213c0 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -1547,6 +1547,28 @@ static bool node_is_interrupt_provider(struct node *node)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +static void check_interrupt_provider(struct check *c,
> + struct dt_info *dti,
> + struct node *node)
> +{
> + struct property *prop;
> +
> + if (!node_is_interrupt_provider(node))
> + return;
> +
> + prop = get_property(node, "#interrupt-cells");
> + if (!prop)
> + FAIL(c, dti, node,
> + "Missing #interrupt-cells in interrupt provider");
> +
> + prop = get_property(node, "#address-cells");
> + if (!prop)
> + FAIL(c, dti, node,
> + "Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider");
> +}
> +WARNING(interrupt_provider, check_interrupt_provider, NULL);
> +
> static void check_interrupts_property(struct check *c,
> struct dt_info *dti,
> struct node *node)
> @@ -1604,7 +1626,7 @@ static void check_interrupts_property(struct check *c,
>
> prop = get_property(irq_node, "#interrupt-cells");
> if (!prop) {
> - FAIL(c, dti, irq_node, "Missing #interrupt-cells in interrupt-parent");
> + /* We warn about that already in another test. */
Rather than exiting early here, you should make the other test a
prerequisite for this one. Then you can assume it's already passed by
the time you get here.
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1828,6 +1850,7 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = {
> &deprecated_gpio_property,
> &gpios_property,
> &interrupts_property,
> + &interrupt_provider,
>
> &alias_paths,
>
> diff --git a/tests/bad-interrupt-controller.dts b/tests/bad-interrupt-controller.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..62fa118
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/bad-interrupt-controller.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +/ {
> + intc: interrupt-controller {
> + interrupt-controller;
> + };
> +};
> diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> index eccb85d..294585b 100755
> --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh
> @@ -714,6 +714,7 @@ dtc_tests () {
> check_tests "$SRCDIR/bad-graph.dts" graph_endpoint
> run_sh_test "$SRCDIR/dtc-checkfails.sh" deprecated_gpio_property -- -Wdeprecated_gpio_property -I dts -O dtb "$SRCDIR/bad-gpio.dts"
> check_tests "$SRCDIR/bad-interrupt-cells.dts" interrupts_property
> + check_tests "$SRCDIR/bad-interrupt-controller.dts" interrupt_provider
> run_sh_test "$SRCDIR/dtc-checkfails.sh" node_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_char.dtb
> run_sh_test "$SRCDIR/dtc-checkfails.sh" node_name_format -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_format.dtb
> run_sh_test "$SRCDIR/dtc-checkfails.sh" property_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_prop_char.dtb
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
