On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:02:52PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Fix 'saftey' and 'additional' typos noticed in the assumption series. > Reword the ASSUME_NO_ROLLBACK slightly to improve clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Series applied to master, thanks. > --- > > libfdt/libfdt_internal.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libfdt/libfdt_internal.h b/libfdt/libfdt_internal.h > index e9913cd..3201678 100644 > --- a/libfdt/libfdt_internal.h > +++ b/libfdt/libfdt_internal.h > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline struct fdt_reserve_entry *fdt_mem_rsv_w_(void *fdt, int n) > > /* > * Defines assumptions which can be enabled. Each of these can be enabled > - * individually. For maximum saftey, don't enable any assumptions! > + * individually. For maximum safety, don't enable any assumptions! > * > * For minimal code size and no safety, use ASSUME_PERFECT at your own risk. > * You should have another method of validating the device tree, such as a > @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ enum { > ASSUME_LATEST = 1 << 2, > > /* > - * This assume that it is OK for a failed additional to the device tree > - * due to lack of space or some other problem can skip any rollback > + * This assumes that it is OK for a failed addition to the device tree, > + * due to lack of space or some other problem, to skip any rollback > * steps (such as dropping the property name from the string table). > * This is safe to enable in most circumstances, even though it may > * leave the tree in a sub-optimal state. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature