On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:46:55AM +0000, Yuan, Linyu (NSB - CN/Shanghai) wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Gibson [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 10:22 AM > > To: Yuan, Linyu (NSB - CN/Shanghai) > > Cc: Rob Herring; devicetree-spec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jon Loeliger; Devicetree > > Compiler > > Subject: Re: integer lost format from dtb to dts > > > > > I do found some colleague in our company use coverted dts from dtb > > > directly, which is not good. > > > > Yes, that's not usually a good idea. Think of dtb->dts conversion > > like a decompile. It can be useful for debugging, and sometimes as a > > starting point for cleaning up new sources, but it's not generally > > useful for a production process. > > So no plan to add it in future and will not accept it even if someone try to > extend dtb to support it ? Not necessarily, but I'd need a pretty convincing reason to include that code. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
