On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:00:10AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 02/27/18 09:58, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 02/27/18 07:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:22 PM, <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I am once again out of my depth with bison and flex.
> >>
> >> Can't help on that one...
> >>
> >>> The Devicetree Specification and ePAPR both tell me that I can
> >>> put a label on a node, as in:
> >>>
> >>> [label:] node-name[@unit-address] {
> >>> [properties definitions]
> >>> [child nodes]
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Applying this to the root node would also imply that a unit-address is
> >> also allowed which it is not. I'd contend that the root is special.
> >
> > Good point. Looks like I may have some additions to propose for the
> > spec to clarify things.
> >
> > Also not mentioned in the spec:
>
> > - "[label:]" should be something like "[label:} ..." (not sure of
>
> [label:] ...
>
> Never a shift key when you need one. Always a shift key when you
> don't need one.
Oh is *that* why they call them shift/reduce conflicts ;-p.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
