Hi all,
Using "fragment@N" as node name for overlay fragments violates unit
address rules:
<stdout>: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /fragment@0 has a unit name, but no reg property
This patch series (for dtc) fixes:
1. generation of node names when using overlay sugar syntax,
2. all documentation and tests.
If this is accepted, I'll send similar patches for Linux.
Note that I've been using "fragment-N" in hand-written DT overlays for
years, so this is known to work fine with Linux.
Thanks for your comments!
Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
overlay: Do not use @ in overlay fragment generation
Use "fragment-N" instead of "fragment@N"
Documentation/dt-object-internal.txt | 20 +++++++--------
livetree.c | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_bad_index.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_base.dtsi | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_empty_index.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_index_trailing.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_path_empty_prop.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_path_only.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_path_only_sep.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_bad_fixup_path_prop.dts | 2 +-
tests/overlay_overlay.dts | 16 ++++++------
tests/overlay_overlay_manual_fixups.dts | 38 ++++++++++++++---------------
tests/overlay_overlay_no_fixups.dts | 16 ++++++------
tests/stacked_overlay_bar.dts | 2 +-
tests/stacked_overlay_baz.dts | 2 +-
15 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
