Hello! I see the syntactic sugar patch was merged in late September this year. I have some resulting questions: 1.) Are there plans to deprecate the handcrafted fragment syntax? I find it somewhat useful for hacking things into /soc (via target-path) for development since this node is often not labelled, so it's probably a good idea to ask this up front. =) 2.) Is it expected and/or OK that the output/behavior of this dtc(1) gets kind of funky when combining handcrafted fragments with these generated fragments? "funky" ranges from outright errors to silently merging a handcrafted fragment into a generated fragment in a way that yields an overlay that you're definitely not expecting. If this isn't a supported use-case, then I suppose this is OK. I ask because I recently implemented this syntax into our BSDL dtc, and naturally in my work I had it generate fragments for these nodes, merge them all into one /, and renumber any handcrafted fragments based on their position and the "fragment delta" (highest generated auto-fragment at that point). The reasoning being that there's likely no good way to merge a manual fragment with one of these auto-fragments, and with our implementation is was almost easier to do this than it is to just discard the handcrafted if we start out with the sugary versions. Thanks, Kyle Evans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
