On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:41:22PM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [... snip ...] > > > > Does this remove the need for the proposed patch, or am I still > > missing something? > > ... nope. Apparently I never tested this with this particular dtc(1) > and instead just assumed it did the same as ours- allocate phandle > sparsely, even with -@. That certainly removes the need for this > patch, and I'm somewhat upset that I hadn't previously considered > this. Ah! Sorry, I'd forgotten about that behaviour of -@. > @David, Jon: Please disregard all of the patches along these lines... > I'll fix this in our dtc, where it should be fixed. Ok :). -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
