On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Kyle Evans <kevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [... snip ...] >> >> Does this remove the need for the proposed patch, or am I still >> missing something? > > ... nope. Apparently I never tested this with this particular dtc(1) > and instead just assumed it did the same as ours- allocate phandle > sparsely, even with -@. That certainly removes the need for this > patch, and I'm somewhat upset that I hadn't previously considered > this. > > @David, Jon: Please disregard all of the patches along these lines... > I'll fix this in our dtc, where it should be fixed. > > Thanks, Frank! Actually, I'm kind of torn on whether this is useful or not. With being able to have EFI-provided FDT, it's hard to guarantee whether the FDT we're provided has been compiled with GPL dtc(1) and -@. The above solves this problem for most of my personal use-cases , though, since I can guarantee that our FDT and U-Boot provided FDT is compiled properly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
