On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 14:18 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > I supposed it's arguable that a PCI ranges property really should have > windows for both prefetchable and non-prefetchable areas, but since > that's not done in practice, it's pretty much moot. They don't have to, only if there's a relevant difference, ie it's perfectly legit for a firmware to assign prefetchable BARs in a non-prefetchable region. Now granted, those are somewhat special cases so maybe we should do just that ... special case PCI and try to not continue that mess with new bindings. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
