>> >> Can we remove the diskprediction-local mgr module from Ceph? >> > > +1 probably, yes. But the implication is that the devicehealth module > will then have no implementation for predict_lift_expectancy. > IMHO, we should simplify that down to something trivial based on the > SMART status + a wearout indicator for flash. That’d be a good place to start. Drive mfgs and smartmontools’ drivedb.h are all over the map wrt attribute IDs and labels - and in some cases even used vs remaining - so we might need to have a regexp sort of match for SAS/SATA drives. NVMe should be a bit more standardized. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
