RE: [ceph-users] v16.2.13 Pacific released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What is with this latency issue? From what I have read here on mailing list, to me this looks bad. Until someone from ceph/redhat says it is not. 

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58530
https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@xxxxxxx/msg19012.html


> 
> We're happy to announce the 13th backport release in the Pacific series.
> 
> https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2023/v16-2-13-pacific-released/
> 
> Notable Changes
> ---------------
> 
> * CEPHFS: Rename the `mds_max_retries_on_remount_failure` option to
>   `client_max_retries_on_remount_failure` and move it from mds.yaml.in
> to
>   mds-client.yaml.in because this option was only used by MDS client
> from its
>   birth.
> 
> * `ceph mgr dump` command now outputs `last_failure_osd_epoch` and
>   `active_clients` fields at the top level.  Previously, these fields
> were
>   output under `always_on_modules` field.
> 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux