Re: [ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



rados runs for pacific_16.2.11_RC3 look good! Unrelated failures summarized in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1.

Thanks,
Neha

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:43 AM Neha Ojha <nojha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:41 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
thanks Yuri, rgw approved based on today's results from
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-20_15:27:49-rgw-pacific_16.2.11_RC2-distro-default-smithi/

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:08 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you look at the pacific 16.2.8 QE validation history (
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55356), we had pacific-x, nautilus-x, and
> pacific-p2p all green with one exception (
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51652)
>
> Now we see so many failures in this point release with references to old
> issues.
>
> Is there anything we can fix to make them less "red"?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 2:56 PM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I reviewed the upgrade runs:
>>
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:57:57-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_21:47:46-upgrade:nautilus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:58:18-upgrade:octopus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-14_15:41:10-upgrade:octopus-x-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> Failures:
>>   1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50618 -- known bug assigned to
>> Ilya; assuming it's not a big deal since it's been around for over a year
>>
>> Details:
>>   1. qemu_xfstests_luks1 failed on xfstest 168 - Ceph - RBD
>>
>>
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-13_15:58:24-upgrade:pacific-p2p-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2022-12-14_15:40:37-upgrade:pacific-p2p-pacific_16.2.11_RC-distro-default-smithi/
>>
>> Failures, unrelated:
>>   1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58223 -- new failure reported by me
>> 7 days ago; seems infrastructure related and not regression-related
>>   2. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52590 -- closed by Casey; must not
>> be of importance
>>   3. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58289 -- new failure raised by me
>> today; seems related to other "wait_for_recovery" failures, which are
>> generally not cause for concern since they're so infrequent.
>>   4. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51652 -- known bug from over a year
>> ago
>>
>> Details;
>>   1. failure on `sudo fuser -v /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend` -
>> Infrastructure
>>   2. "[ FAILED ] CmpOmap.cmp_vals_u64_invalid_default" in
>> upgrade:pacific-p2p-pacific - Ceph - RGW
>>   3. "AssertionError: wait_for_recovery: failed before timeout expired"
>> from down pg in pacific-p2p-pacific - Ceph - RADOS
>>   4. heartbeat timeouts on filestore OSDs while deleting objects in
>> upgrade:pacific-p2p-pacific - Ceph - RADOS
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:34 PM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Details of this release are summarized here:
>>> >
>>> > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58257#note-1
>>> > Release Notes - TBD
>>> >
>>> > Seeking approvals for:
>>> >
>>> > rados - Neha (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 is still being

We are still waiting on test runs for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49431 to go through.

Thanks,
Neha
 
>>> > tested and will be merged soon)
>>> > rook - Sébastien Han
>>> > cephadm - Adam
>>> > dashboard - Ernesto
>>> > rgw - Casey (rwg will be rerun on the latest SHA1)
>>> > rbd - Ilya, Deepika
>>> > krbd - Ilya, Deepika
>>> > fs - Venky, Patrick
>>> > upgrade/nautilus-x (pacific) - Neha, Laura
>>> > upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Neha, Laura
>>> > upgrade/pacific-p2p - Neha - Neha, Laura
>>> > powercycle - Brad
>>>
>>> The failure here is due to fallout from the recent lab issues and was
>>> fixed in main by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49021 I'm waiting
>>> to see if there are plans to backport this to pacific and quincy since
>>> that will be needed.
>>>
>>> > ceph-volume - Guillaume, Adam K
>>> >
>>> > Thx
>>> > YuriW
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Laura Flores
>>
>> She/Her/Hers
>>
>> Software Engineer, Ceph Storage
>>
>> Red Hat Inc. <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> Chicago, IL
>>
>> lflores@xxxxxxxxxx
>> M: +17087388804
>> @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat>   Red Hat
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>  Red Hat
>> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux