On 22/03/2022, Adam C. Emerson wrote: > I can imagine a world where if the primary has an idea what the > secondary's polling period is, and there hasn't been much sync > activity and the primary knows the secondary won't poll for a while, > it might be worthwhile to send a single wakeup event when there's new > data available telling it that there's new stuff in the data log. Given that in rgw_data_sync we have #define INCREMENTAL_INTERVAL 20 I'd be extremely skeptical that it's worth it. I might be wrong, but if we're polling the data log every twenty seconds, I'd be very surprised if we saw much concrete benefit from sending a wakeup, in the context of fetching the right log shard them copying the data. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
