Update: Neha is finalizing reviewing rados and upgrades (I restarted some tests FYI) Still need rgw approval - Casey, Matt? Thx YuriW On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:08 AM Sebastian Wagner <sewagner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 29.11.21 um 18:23 schrieb Yuri Weinstein: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53324 > > Release Notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44131 > > > > Seeking approvals for: > > > > rados - Neha > rados/cephadm looks good. Except for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53365 > > rgw - Casey > > rbd - Ilya, Deepika > > krbd Ilya, Deepika > > fs - Venky, Patrick > > upgrade/nautilus-x - Neha, Josh > > upgrade/pacific-p2p - Neha, Josh > > > > ======================== > > We are also publishing a release candidate this time for users to try > > for testing only. > > > > The branch name is pacific-16.2.7_RC1 > > (https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/pacific-16.2.7_RC1/fdc003bc12f1b2443c4596eeacb32cf62e806970/) > > > > ***Don’t use this RC on production clusters!*** > > > > The idea of doing Release Candidates (RC) for point releases before > > doing final point releases was discussed in the first-ever Ceph User + > > Dev Monthly Meeting. Everybody thought that it was a good idea, to > > help identify bugs that do not get caught in integration testing. > > > > The goal is to give users time to test and give feedback on RC > > releases while our upstream long-running cluster also runs the same RC > > release during that time (period of one week). We will kick this > > process off with 16.2.7 and the pacific-16.2.7_RC1 release is now > > available for users to test. > > > > Please respond to this email to provide any feedback on issues found > > in this release. > > > > Thx > > YuriW > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
