On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:12:06AM -0000, Jin Hase wrote: > I understand the detail behavior, thanks. > > My concerns are: > How to recover backfill_unfound state if this behavior is modified > to be detected as backfill_unfound again even if in the above case. > Whether deep scrub can be executed in the backfill_unfound state > and recover this situation. If that doesn't work, I'm wondering how > to address situation. I believe the deep scrub will not run when the state is backfill_unfound. You will need to resolve "unfound" objects first to change the state. Usually it means just to run ceph pg $pgid mark_unfound_lost delete Because you can't do much in this situation -- the object is not recoverable, just remove the objects remnants. After this the pg will enter the clean state. > Anyway, I'd like to know this is expected behavior or not, and how > to fix it if this is not expected behavior. +1 -- Mykola Golub _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
