Inline: Thanks! ––––––––– Sébastien Han Senior Principal Software Engineer, Storage Architect "Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood." On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:29 AM Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Highlights from this weeks' CLT meeting: > > - Can we deprecate ceph-nano? > - Yes; it is no longer maintained. Josh will note as much in the > README and archive this and other old repos in the github org. > - ceph-adm replaces most use cases since it supports > containerization and deployment onto a single host. Team will explore > supporting OSDs on loopback devices, which is the main differentiator. Small correction, ceph-nano does not use loopback devices, it runs "ceph-osd --mkfs" on a directory and optionally can take block device if provided. As gaps I can see: * cephadm does not have multi-clusters support. With cn you can run as many clusters with any Ceph version. * cephadm only runs on Linux, where cn can run on any OS that has a Docker daemon running Otherwise, I'm fine with archiving the repository. However, there is still a lot of interest, I'm frequently getting e-mail about it so we should make it clear that cephadm replaces it. Also, are we ok to lose the audience of non-Linux users? I believe it makes a good portion of the user base. FYI I just archived https://github.com/ceph/cn-core which goal was to use a Golang based bootstrapper instead of the demo.sh script from ceph-container. > > - Discussed the Redmine tracker triage process and considered removing > the top-level "Ceph" project from the list of available new ticket > destinations. I and others pushed back on this since we need a place > to put non-subproject-specific issues, so we agreed that going forward > project leads will scrub the top-level Ceph project for new relevant > issues during their regular bug scrubs. I took an action item to go > through the existing back log and sort it appropriately (though I also > think Sage did a bunch this morning). > > - We added a COSI repository in the Ceph org for working with RGW. > - Pacific v16.2.2 needed release notes review, which it got so the > release is out now. > - We got a question about new options for the dashboard and other > component communication, following on from the CDS sessions. Ernesto > will follow up on this. > > -Greg > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
