> >> We do have the version-added directive in sphinx to help with this sort >> of indicator, but it is harder to maintain - I just removed some >> referencing cuttlefish last week! > > On this subject, I was reading > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/multisite/ says "New in > version Jewel." and there's six references to "Kraken". > > Are we good with cleaning up all references to EOL versions? The docs > could simply describe the current behavior and avoid mentioning > releases that are not active (defined on > https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/) > > - Ken I get where you’re coming from. Tealistically there are a significant number of people who are — for various reasons — running older releases, and we should not abandon them. Sure, one can to a certain extent select an older release by editing the URL, but this isn’t ubiquitously known. At a recent employer I inherited 15 or so Infernalis clusters. Sometimes upgrading or replacing is feasible, sometimes it isn’t, so from personal experience I favor being sensitive to existing production installations. Granted, over time that might get unwieldy, and if something mentions “The new Kraken release” that can and should be freshened; I made a few updates to that end last year. — aad _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
