On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:12 PM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hi Kefu, > > continuing our discussion from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40230 > on the future of this BOOST_ASIO_USE_TS_EXECUTOR_AS_DEFAULT define > > to summarize the issue: > > in 1.66, boost::asio made a lot of changes for 'Networking TS > compatibility', including the executors proposed therein. i raised > this on ceph-devel in the thread "coming in boost 1.66" (see > https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg39243.html) > > meanwhile, the c++ standards committee was working on 'unified > executors' proposals outside of the Networking TS, and networking was > left out of c++20 so it could wait for a unified executor model > instead of adding its own > > in 1.74, boost::asio added support for this new executor model, which > its docs summarize well at > https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_74_0/doc/html/boost_asio/std_executors.html. > a BOOST_ASIO_USE_TS_EXECUTOR_AS_DEFAULT option was added to preserve > compatibility with existing code, so ceph now relies on this in > several places to build against boost 1.74+ > > > i've been hesitant to push for a conversion to this new model for two > main reasons: > * it's mostly internal to asio, so i don't see much benefit to > changing as long as boost continues to support the TS executors > * it's hard to tell how close it is to the 'final form' that we'll see > in a future c++ standard, so later changes may require us to do > another conversion > > does anyone else have a stake in this? if there's interest in working > on it, i'm happy to help with review I'd vote for at least just being consistent since it's an internal-only change. Right now, "src/rgw/CMakeLists.txt" has "add_definitions(-DBOOST_ASIO_USE_TS_EXECUTOR_AS_DEFAULT)" (via commit 722b4303b198) and so does "src/librbd/CMakeList.txt" (via commit 3d708219092d). Since the core code is compiled w/ the new TS executor enabled but the tests don't seem to include that, maybe we just need to make it global. -- Jason _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx