Yes, the ansible failures are the same - selinux issues - as seen with
15.2.4. Go ahead with 15.2.5.
On 9/10/20 9:14 AM, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Josh, I think Brad will agree to appore ceph-ansible as is.
Otherwise is ready for publishing
David FYI
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:06 AM Neha Ojha <nojha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:26 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only remaining approvals are:
rados on merged PR - Neha?
approved
powercycle - Neha?
approved
ceph-ansible - Brad?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:40 PM Josh Durgin <jdurgin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/2/20 8:20 AM, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
Details of this release summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/47173#note-1
smoke - PASSED
rados - approved Neha?
rgw - approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
kcephfs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
upgrade/mimic-x (octopus) - PASSED
upgrade/nautilus-x (octopus) - PASSED
upgrade/octopus-p2p - Josh, Naha approved?
upgrade/client-upgrade-luminous-octopus - PASSED
upgrade/client-upgrade-mimic-octopus - PASSED
upgrade/client-upgrade-nautilus-octopus - PASSED
powercycle - approved Neha?
ceph-ansible - approved Brad?
ceph-volume - approved Jan? (ceph-ansible bug? number?)
(please speak up if something is missing)
David, Josh - is it to upgrade time sepia ?.
The sepia upgrade ran into some problems, however they were not caused
by the new code. 15.2.5 is good to go.
Tracking the root cause of the upgrade issue in
https://trello.com/c/bH8sqpe2/591-mon-make-trimming-more-efficient.
Neha
Josh
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
