Re: Comparison of 3 replication models on Pech OSD cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wow, crimson osd has some big problems if its latency is 10ms. OK, let's just wait until it's fixed.

Problem is that you don't know which data to resync without journaling. AFAIK Linstor/drbd9 does a similar thing, something like "write intent journaling", to provide fast resyncs, even though they don't have EC (they have it in beta). So I think the client-based approach can only be possible without fully ditching atomicity. Maybe for example it should involve some additional lazy synchronization among OSDs themselves using pglogs from client-driven writes. Hm.. sounds like it's even not unreal in ceph..:-)

Regarding the latency test, it also depends on network latency, so local test isn't the same as a clustered one. But thanks anyway. Pech OSD seems fast :-)
--
With best regards,
Vitaliy Filippov
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux