Re: RGW Tracing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

Matt

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:38 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As a first step, it's fine to stop in rgw_bucket.cc. Eventually, we'll
> want a trace to cover each rados request, since those account for most
> of our time. But for your PR, I think it's better to get broad
> coverage of lots of different code paths, rather than going really
> deep into a few.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:25 AM Abhinav Singh
> <singhabhinav0796@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > When am tracing request relating to bucket like creating one or tags operation in a bucket, then upto what level should trace it so for the trace to be useful, for example after a bucket is created , then after that the major time is taken by `store_bucket_instane_info` and `store_bucket_entrypoint_info`, in the file `rgw_bucket.cc` so is it necessary to go deep inside this function(they are calling `RGWSI_Bucket_SObj` inside), or till rgw_bucket.cc is fine?
> >
> > Thank you.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>


-- 

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux