Re: Does CephFS Fuse have to be slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 7:35 PM Yan, Zheng <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:38 AM Robert LeBlanc <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have been evaluating other cluster storage solutions and one of them is just about as fast as Ceph, but only uses FUSE. They mentioned that recent improvement in the FUSE code allows for similar performance to kernel code. So, I'm doing some tests between CephFS kernel and FUSE and that is not true in the Ceph case.
>

do they mention which improvement?
 
I think it was in regards to removing some serial code paths. I don't know if it was async work or parallel thread work. And recent as in like 4.9 recent.

----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux