On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Please see details: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/42377#note-1 > > Sage, if you agree with assumption and comments, it's ready for final approval. > > David FYI > > rados - Neha approved > rgw - Casey approved > rbd - Jason approved > krbd - Ilya approved > fs - Patrick approved > kcephfs - Patrick approved > multimds - Patrick approved > ceph-deploy - Sage approve? > ceph-disk - Nathan approved > upgrade/client-upgrade-hammer (luminous) - Sage agree? > upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel (luminous) - Sage agree? > upgrade/luminous-p2p - Sage agree? > upgrade/jewel-x (luminous) - Sage agree? Yeah, most of these show failures on 14.04 and old centos only so it's a ceph-cm-ansible problem. On a couple those are the only os targets so we're flying a bit blind, but I think it's not worth going back to fix up the playbook for these old distros. +1 > upgrade/kraken-x (luminous) - REMOVED/ N/A > powercycle - Neha approved > ceph-ansible - Bred fixed, approve ? > upgrade/luminous-x (mimic) PASSED > upgrade/luminous-x (nautilus) - PASSED > ceph-volume - PASSED > (please speak up if something is missing) > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
