Sebastian,
I figured that kube-helm's documentation can be removed, but I wanted to make sure with the community before I did it.
Here's the PR that removes the kube-helm docs:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:13 PM Sebastian Wagner <swagner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Zac,
Am 04.12.19 um 00:04 schrieb John Zachary Dover:
> I am updating the Ceph documentation. Included in this email is a
> proposed change to
> the documentation and a request for information pertaining to that
> proposed change.
> If you know about the issue behind the proposed change and you have
> information
> pertinent to it that you would like to enshrine in the documentation,
> reply to this
> email and tell me.
>
>
> Documentation Link: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/kube-helm/
>
> Proposed Change: Removing the Helm-related material from the
> documentation entirely.
>
> Zac's Request: Can anyone provide a compelling reason for keeping
> the Helm documentation?
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-helm is unmaintained since two years
already. Which means I really except this to fail to properly deploy an
octopus cluster. Why keep an installation documentation that is going to
fail? Everyone is using Rook nowadays.
As we still have the old documentations online (
https://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/ ), so users can still have a look,
despite it being removed from octopus.
Best,
Sebastian
>
>
>
> Tracking Information (this can be ignored by everyone but Zac)
> Bug # 2 here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/Report_Documentation_Bugs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
