On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:27 AM Anthony D'Atri <aad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Did you mean ceph-daemon, or perhaps ceph-volume?
the new installation/management feature for Octopus - https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/bootstrap/
> Perhaps, all of these design points trace back to a single idea - support multiple ceph clusters on the same set of machine(s). Is this the goal? Is this want Ceph users want?
Custom cluster names were originally intended for this purpose, though there were some gaps in implemention. When custom cluster names began to be deprecated, it was claimed that almost nobody ever made us of this functionality. So unless there’s been a radical shift, multiple clusters on the same set of systems is not a concern going forward.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
