Re: unblocking the py3 transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:02:07AM -0500, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 10:11 AM Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > The transition to python3-only is blocked on three missing python packages
>> > in EPEL7:
>> >
>> > - python36-werkzeug: tracked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545888
>> > - python36-pecan: tracked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766839
>> > - python36-cherrypy: tracked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765032
>> >
>> > In order to get these into EPEL, they need to go into Fedora first, which
>> > has its own (slow) process.  In the meantime, these packages are easy to
>> > build manually as one-offs (and may already have been built by David and
>> > sitting in a temporary repo).
>> >
>> > To unblock this, what if we require that temporary repo for centos7
>> > *master* installs, and add it to the teuthology workers via
>> > ceph-cm-ansible?  The assumption is that by the time we release octopus we
>> > will have gotten the dependencies in to the appropriate upstream repos.
>> > That means we have until March 2020... 4 months away.
>>
>> Update:
>>
>> I just talked to Alfredo and the (current) blocker is cherrypy.. there are
>> a zillion dependencies and the maintainer doesn't want to pull them in.
>>
>> So, the current plan is now to drop centos7 support for octopus.  That
>> should simplify things drastically!
>
>Quick update on this, we are working hard on trying to get cherrypy
>fully available, and we made some progress yesterday. Being able to
>concentrate on EPEL8 (CentOS8) is going
>to be a tremendous help.
The ceph-volume's (vagrant based) functional tests currently rely a lot on 
centos7 (at least in name, seem like the tests actually download Fedora 22?).  
While I'd like to replace this testing infrastructure at some point, it works 
for now and its probably better to move them from Centos7/Fedora22 to Centos8/?.
However there don't seem to be Centos8 vagrant images. Any pointers as to what 
to use instead?
>
>We will follow Sage's suggestion of getting the packages into a
>self-hosted repo so that we don't have to wait (weeks!) for packages
>to become available officially.
>>
>> sage
>_______________________________________________
>Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx

-- 
Jan Fajerski
Senior Software Engineer Enterprise Storage
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux