On 8/20/19 7:58 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2019-08-15T19:04:11, Mark Nelson <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ha, I hadn't thought to check if that existed which was probably pretty
short-sighted on my part. :)
It's somewhat limited (only does GET/PUT/DELETE), but the crucial
benefit is that it allows direct comparison between the various
protocols.
Indeed! Now that we have client endpoints and the universal fio wrapper
in cbt it should be fairly easy to add that as another supported option
there too. I'll be very curious to see how hsbench and fio compare in
terms of client side CPU usage and overall throughput. I'm pushing
about 15K 4K gets with hsbench right now at sufficiently high thread
counts, but it's still using a lot of CPU to do it (~700%!) that's far
better than getput was doing at least, but I still need to profile to
see what's driving the usage up so high.
Mark
Thanks,
Lars
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
