Re: fix for hidden corei7 requirement in binary packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:24 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +dev@ceph
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:50 AM Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > After upgrading some old Phenom servers from Fedora/Freed-ora 29 to
> > 30's, to ceph-14.2.2, I was surprised by very early crashes of both
> > ceph-mon and ceph-osd.  After ruling out disk and memory corruption, I
> > investigated a bit noticed all of them crashed during pre-main() init
> > section processing, at an instruction not available on the Phenom X6
> > processors that support sse4a, but not e.g. sse4.1.
> >
> > It turns out that much of librte is built with -march=corei7.  That's a
> > little excessive, considering that x86/rte_memcpy.h would be happy
> > enough with -msse4.1, but not with earlier sse versions that Fedora is
> > supposed to target.
> >
> > I understand rte_memcpy.h is meant for better performance, inlining
> > fixed-size and known-alignment implementations of memcpy into users.
> > Alas, that requires setting a baseline target processor, and you'll only
> > get as efficient an implementation as what's built in.
> >
> > I noticed an attempt for dynamic selection, but GCC rightfully won't
> > inline across different target flags, so we'd have to give up inlining
> > to get better dynamic behavior.  The good news is that glibc already
> > offers dynamic selection of memcpy implementations, so hopefully the
> > impact of this change won't be much worse than that of enabling dynamic
> > selection, without the complications.
> >
> > If that's not good enough, compiling ceph with flags that enable SSE4.1,
> > AVX2 or AVX512, or with a -march flag that implicitly enables them,
> > would restore current performance, but without that, you will (with the
> > patch below) get a package that runs on a broader range of processors,
> > that the base distro (through the compiler's baseline flags) chooses to
> > support.  It's not nice when you install a package on a processor that's
> > supposed to be supported and suddenly you're no longer sure it is ;-)
> >
> > Perhaps building a shared librte, so that one could build and install
> > builds targeting different ISA versions, without having to rebuild all
> > of ceph, would be a reasonable way to address the better tuning of these
> > performance-critical bits.
> >
> >
> >
> > src/spdk/dpdk:
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h
> > index 7b758094d..ce714bf02 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h
> > @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ extern "C" {
> >  static __rte_always_inline void *
> >  rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n);
> >
> > +#ifndef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_1
> > +
> > +static __rte_always_inline void *
> > +rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> > +{
> > +  return memcpy(dst, src, n);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#else /* RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_1 */
> > +
> >  #ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F
> >
> >  #define ALIGNMENT_MASK 0x3F
> > @@ -869,6 +879,8 @@ rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n)
> >                 return rte_memcpy_generic(dst, src, n);
> >  }
> >
> > +#endif /* RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_1 */
> > +
> >  #ifdef __cplusplus
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/mk/machine/default/rte.vars.mk b/mk/machine/default/rte.vars.mk
> > index df08d3b03..6bf695849 100644
> > --- a/mk/machine/default/rte.vars.mk
> > +++ b/mk/machine/default/rte.vars.mk
> > @@ -27,4 +27,4 @@
> >  # CPU_LDFLAGS =
> >  # CPU_ASFLAGS =
> >
> > -MACHINE_CFLAGS += -march=corei7
> > +# MACHINE_CFLAGS += -march=corei7


Hi Alexandre, thanks for the bug report and patch. the bug is tracked
by https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41330, and a fix is posted at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29728

> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter  he/him   https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
> > Be the change, be Free!                 FSF Latin America board member
> > GNU Toolchain Engineer                        Free Software Evangelist
> > Hay que enGNUrecerse, pero sin perder la terGNUra jamás - Che GNUevara
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



-- 
Regards
Kefu Chai
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux