On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:54 AM Jan Fajerski <jfajerski@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi list, > while discussing the snap-schedule module, a feature request for protecting > snapshots against deletion came up. Where/when did this discussion happen? +Venky/+Daniel have been planning work on this and should be in the loop. > This is partly tied to the scheduled > pruning, when a user wants to protect an individual snapshot from being pruned. > It could however also be used to protect individual snapshots from being > accidentally deleted. Another possibility would be to have a snapshot copy operation. Then the snapshot with a generated schedule based name could be saved by the user. I don't know yet how technically difficult that would be. > Is a virtual xattr on a virtual directory a bad idea? No, it's fine. -- Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D. He / Him / His Senior Software Engineer Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
