sorry for the double post. forwarding to the correct list.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:16 PM kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi Sam,
>
> as you know, i am working on replicated write. and, i think we need to
> make it an optional phase in ClientRequest::PGPipeline, but i am not
> quite sure about how we should represent it as a blocking step using
> dump_detail()
>
> currently, my plan is to add a Blocker for wrapping 1 * local_txn + m
> * replicated_txn. and print them as
> - a tid,
> - a local return code
> - an array of {peer:pg_shard_t, last_complete_on_disk:eversion}
>
> does this make sense to you?
>
> --
> Regards
> Kefu Chai
--
Regards
Kefu Chai
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
