From: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:42:07 +0800
> 在 2024/6/14 18:54, Florian Westphal 写道:
> > luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> include/net/inet_connection_sock.h | 2 +-
> >> net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +-
> >> net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +-
> >> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> index 7d6b1254c92d..8773d161d184 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(struct sock *sk,
> >> struct request_sock *req,
> >> struct sock *child);
> >> void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> >> - unsigned long timeout);
> >> + unsigned long timeout, bool *found_dup_sk);
> > Nit:
> >
> > I think it would be preferrable to change retval to bool rather than
> > bool *found_dup_sk extra arg, so one can do
+1
> >
> > bool inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> > unsigned long timeout)
> > {
> > if (!reqsk_queue_hash_req(req, timeout))
> > return false;
> >
> > i.e. let retval indicate wheter reqsk was inserted or not.
> >
> > Patch looks good to me otherwise.
>
> Thank you for your confirmation!
>
> Regarding your suggestion, I had considered it before,
> but besides tcp_conn_request() calling inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(),
> dccp_v4(v6)_conn_request() also calls it. However, there is no
> consideration for a failed insertion within that function, so it's
> reasonable to let the caller decide whether to check for duplicate
> reqsk.
I guess you followed 01770a1661657 where found_dup_sk was introduced,
but note that the commit is specific to TCP SYN Cookie and TCP Fast Open
and DCCP is not related.
Then, own_req is common to TCP and DCCP, so found_dup_sk was added as an
additional argument.
However, another similar commit 5e0724d027f05 actually added own_req check
in DCCP path.
I personally would'nt care if DCCP was not changed to handle such a
failure because DCCP will be removed next year, but I still prefer
Florian's suggestion.
Thanks
