Hi Florian/Paolo, As Florian suggested I changed the subject title, due to this patch is pushed in different link. Please find the nf_reset_ct changes patch in the below link https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230303094221.1501961-1-madhu.koriginja@xxxxxxx/T/ Please can you also suggest me how to push patch on 4.19 LTS kernel. Thanks & Regards, Madhu K -----Original Message----- From: Madhu Koriginja Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 3:23 PM To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Vani Namala <vani.namala@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] [net:netfilter]: Keep conntrack reference until IPsecv6 policy checks are done Hi Paolo, I updated the patch with nf_reset_ct change (nf_reset() replaced with nf_reset_ct) to align with the latest kernel code. Hi All, I also want to push this change (with nf_reset) in 4.19 LTS kernel, please can you tell me how can I push to that version? Thanks in advance. Hi Florian, In patchv3 updated the subject line as you suggested. Thanks & Regards, Madhu K -----Original Message----- From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 7:58 PM To: Madhu Koriginja <madhu.koriginja@xxxxxxx>; gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Vani Namala <vani.namala@xxxxxxx> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] [net:netfilter]: Keep conntrack reference until IPsecv6 policy checks are done Caution: EXT Email On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 16:53 +0530, Madhu Koriginja wrote: > Keep the conntrack reference until policy checks have been performed > for IPsec V6 NAT support. The reference needs to be dropped before a > packet is queued to avoid having the conntrack module unloadable. > > Signed-off-by: Madhu Koriginja <madhu.koriginja@xxxxxxx> > V1-V2: added missing () in ip6_input.c in below condition > if (!(ipprot->flags & INET6_PROTO_NOPOLICY)) > --- > net/dccp/ipv6.c | 1 + > net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 14 +++++++------- > net/ipv6/raw.c | 2 +- > net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 ++ > net/ipv6/udp.c | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c index > 58a401e9cf09..eb503096db6c 100644 > --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c > +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c > @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) > > if (!xfrm6_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) > goto discard_and_relse; > + nf_reset(skb); nf_reset() is gone since commit 895b5c9f206e ("netfilter: drop bridge nf reset from nf_reset"), you should use instead nf_reset_ct(): in the current form the patch does not apply cleanly (nor build after manual edit). Cheers, Paolo
