Re: [trivial PATCH] treewide: Convert switch/case fallthrough; to break;

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-09-09 21:06, Joe Perches wrote:
fallthrough to a separate case/default label break; isn't very readable.

Convert pseudo-keyword fallthrough; statements to a simple break; when
the next label is case or default and the only statement in the next
label block is break;

Found using:

$ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "fallthrough;(\s*(case\s+\w+|default)\s*:\s*){1,7}break;" *

Miscellanea:

o Move or coalesce a couple label blocks above a default: block.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Compiled allyesconfig x86-64 only.
A few files for other arches were not compiled.


[...]
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index c192544e874b..743db1abec40 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -3777,7 +3777,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
  	switch (FIELD_GET(IDR0_TTF, reg)) {
  	case IDR0_TTF_AARCH32_64:
  		smmu->ias = 40;
-		fallthrough;
+		break;
  	case IDR0_TTF_AARCH64:
  		break;
  	default:

I have to say I don't really agree with the readability argument for this one - a fallthrough is semantically correct here, since the first case is a superset of the second. It just happens that anything we would do for the common subset is implicitly assumed (there are other potential cases we simply haven't added support for at the moment), thus the second case is currently empty.

This change actively obfuscates that distinction.

Robin.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux