> > Applied, but I wonder if you'll also need something like tcp's SIOCOUTQNSD? > A good question. SIOCOUTQNSD is not mentioned in man 7 tcp and I didn't know and consider it. Now that I looked it up (bytes of unsent packets in send buffer) maybe this patch's ioctl should be renamed SIOCOUTQNSD, since it returns the byte count of unsent packets. I'm undecided here, this is also the only of these ioctl's that makes sense for DCCP since DCCP does not keep sent but un-acked packets so SIOCOUTQ does not exist for DCCP. Or SIOCOUTQ and SIOCOUTQNSD are the same for DCCP, that's a viewpoint question. And it's anyhow correctly documented in dccp.rst, it's about unsent packets. So I'm undecided here, should I resend my patch renamed to SIOCOUTQNSD? -- Richard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
