On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/01/2018 02:03 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > >> I can't think of any advantage in not having the constructor. > > I can't see any advantage adding another indirect call, > in RETPOLINE world. Can you please elaborate what's the problem here? If slab ctor call have RETPOLINE, then using ctors more does not introduce any security problems and they are not _that_ slow. If slab ctors are not protected, then we have problem that needs to be fixed already. What am I missing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
