On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 07:22 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The first bot that picked this up started spewing:
> >
> > BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#1, syz-executor2/9452
>
> Yes. The bug is not about locking the listener, but protecting fields
> of struct dccp_request_sock
>
> I will provide a patch, once I reach the office and after the breakfast ;)
OK here is what I suggest to fix the races.
diff --git a/include/linux/dccp.h b/include/linux/dccp.h
index 61d042bbbf607253033d9948b291cab2322814ba..68449293c4b6233c1a1d4133b1819376a9310225 100644
--- a/include/linux/dccp.h
+++ b/include/linux/dccp.h
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct dccp_request_sock {
__u64 dreq_isr;
__u64 dreq_gsr;
__be32 dreq_service;
+ spinlock_t dreq_lock;
struct list_head dreq_featneg;
__u32 dreq_timestamp_echo;
__u32 dreq_timestamp_time;
diff --git a/net/dccp/minisocks.c b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
index e267e6f4c9a5566b369a03a600a408e5bd41cbad..abd07a443219853b022bef41cb072e90ff8f07f0 100644
--- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c
+++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ struct sock *dccp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct dccp_request_sock *dreq = dccp_rsk(req);
bool own_req;
+ /* TCP/DCCP listeners became lockless.
+ * DCCP stores complex state in its request_sock, so we need
+ * a protection for them, now this code runs without being protected
+ * by the parent (listener) lock.
+ */
+ spin_lock_bh(&dreq->dreq_lock);
+
/* Check for retransmitted REQUEST */
if (dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_type == DCCP_PKT_REQUEST) {
@@ -156,7 +163,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
inet_rtx_syn_ack(sk, req);
}
/* Network Duplicate, discard packet */
- return NULL;
+ goto out;
}
DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_reset_code = DCCP_RESET_CODE_PACKET_ERROR;
@@ -182,20 +189,20 @@ struct sock *dccp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
child = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock(sk, skb, req, NULL,
req, &own_req);
- if (!child)
- goto listen_overflow;
-
- return inet_csk_complete_hashdance(sk, child, req, own_req);
+ if (child) {
+ child = inet_csk_complete_hashdance(sk, child, req, own_req);
+ goto out;
+ }
-listen_overflow:
- dccp_pr_debug("listen_overflow!\n");
DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_reset_code = DCCP_RESET_CODE_TOO_BUSY;
drop:
if (dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_type != DCCP_PKT_RESET)
req->rsk_ops->send_reset(sk, skb);
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(sk, req);
- return NULL;
+out:
+ spin_unlock_bh(&dreq->dreq_lock);
+ return child;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_check_req);
@@ -246,6 +253,7 @@ int dccp_reqsk_init(struct request_sock *req,
{
struct dccp_request_sock *dreq = dccp_rsk(req);
+ spin_lock_init(&dreq->dreq_lock);
inet_rsk(req)->ir_rmt_port = dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_sport;
inet_rsk(req)->ir_num = ntohs(dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_dport);
inet_rsk(req)->acked = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
